Multiple comparisons: three differences looked real, one survives the family
Type each comparison with its difference and standard error, then the family size. Of three differences at 3.0, 2.6 and 2.2 in a family of 8, one survives, and the rest are not called false.
Your prediction before the experiment
What stays the same
- Typed statements
- Their estimates, standard errors and the order you typed
- Criterion
- The same direction, threshold and family confidence
- Only movement
- The number of statements in the declared family
Try a scenario
The family-size trace
This whole count alone moves the chart. It may exceed the number of rows shown here.
Typed criterion and statements
Favourable direction
Comparison rows
Boundary
The calculation names statements that survive the typed family criterion. It does not score or rank suppliers, select a winner, or call another statement false.
Here is the maths
The formula, in words
Turn the family confidence into alpha. Divide alpha across both interval tails and all statements in the declared family, then multiply that normal critical value by each typed standard error. For higher, the lower edge must be strictly above the threshold. For lower, the upper edge must be strictly below it.
where is the margin for one statement, the normal critical value, the family alpha, the declared family size, and the typed standard error.
A worked example
At 95% family confidence and family size 8, the two-sided critical value is about 2.73. With standard error 1, the lower edges for estimates 3.0, 2.6 and 2.2 are about 0.27, -0.13 and -0.53. Only the first is strictly above threshold 0, so 1 statement survives.
What this does not model
The intervals do not rank suppliers, establish that an excluded statement is false, choose a confidence level, test dependence, or replace the family you declared with only the rows currently displayed.
What the sweep checks
Every whole family size from 1 through the declared size is checked. The first point where a supplier name disappears is reported, and names always remain in typed order.
Source basis
The method is standard simultaneous inference using Bonferroni family confidence mathematics and the union bound. No definition or procedure from sold guidance is reproduced.
Any score, rank, weight, or winner field remains outside this lesson and receives no answer.
Related
- Monte Carlo simulation: one run is vivid and still an anecdoteWatch one seeded run of a two stage delay chain finish on a specific day, and the day feels like the answer. Beside it, the same experiment repeated fills in a histogram, and the interval around its mean tightens as the runs accumulate. The vivid run keeps sitting wherever it happened to land.Interactive lesson · 6 min
- Unchanged region: values you checked, not a range you provedSweep one assumption and watch one answer. Where it holds, the values line up into a region that reads like a guarantee. It is not one: narrow the step and a third answer appears.Interactive lesson · 3 min